A Novel Approach to Skin Lesion Segmentation: Multipath Fusion Model with Fusion Loss.

Segmentation of skin lesions plays a very important role in the early detection of skin cancer. However, indistinguishability due to various artifacts such as hair and contrast between normal skin and lesioned skin is an important challenge for specialist dermatologists. Computer-aided diagnostic systems using deep convolutional neural networks are gaining importance in order to cope with difficulties. This study focuses on deep learning-based fusion networks and fusion loss functions. For the automatic segmentation of skin lesions, U-Net (U-Net + ResNet 2D) with 2D residual blocks and 2D volumetric convolutional neural networks were fused for the first time in this study. Also, a new fusion loss function is proposed by combining Dice Loss (DL) and Focal Tversky Loss (FTL) to make the proposed fused model more robust. Of the 2594 image dataset, 20% is reserved for test data and 80% for training data. In test data training, a Jaccard score of 0.837 and a dice score of 0.918 were obtained. The proposed model was also scored on the ISIC 2018 Task 1 test images, whose ground truths were not shared. The proposed model performed well and achieved a Jaccard index of 0.800 and a dice score of 0.880 in the ISIC 2018 Task 1 test set. In addition, it has been observed that the new fused loss function obtained by fusing Focal Tversky Loss and Dice Loss functions in the proposed model increases the robustness of the model in the tests. The proposed new loss function fusion model has outstripped the cutting-edge approaches in the literature.

Robotic prostatectomy: the anesthetist's view for robotic urological surgeries, a prospective study / Prostatectomia robótica: análise anestesiológica de cirurgias urológicas robóticas: estudo prospectivo / Prostatectomía robótica: análisis anestesiológico de cirugías urológicas robóticas, un estudio prospectivo

Background and objectives: Although many features of robotic prostatectomy are similar to those of conventional laparoscopic urological procedures (such as laparoscopic prostatectomy), the procedure is associated with some drawbacks, which include limited intravenous access, relatively long operating time, deep Trendelenburg position, and high intra-abdominal pressure. The primary aim was to describe respiratory and hemodynamic challenges and the complications related to high intra-abdominal pressure and the deep Trendelenburg position in robotic prostatectomy patients. The secondary aim was to reveal safe discharge criteria from the operating room. Methods: Fifty-three patients who underwent robotic prostatectomy between December 2009 and January 2011 were prospectively enrolled. Main outcome measures were non-invasive monitoring, invasive monitoring and blood gas analysis performed at supine (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + pneumoperitoneum (T2), Trendelenburg-before desufflation (T3), Trendelenburg (after desufflation) (T4), and supine (T5) positions. Results: Fifty-three robotic prostatectomy patients were included in the study. The main clinical challenge in our study group was the choice of ventilation strategy to manage respiratory acidosis, which is detected through end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure and blood gas analysis. Furthermore, the mean arterial pressure remained unchanged, the heart rate decreased significantly and required intervention. The central venous pressure values were also above the normal limits. Conclusion: Respiratory acidosis and "upper airway obstruction-like" clinical symptoms were the main challenges associated with robotic prostatectomy procedures during this study. .

Justificativa e objetivos: Embora muitas características da prostatectomia robótica sejam semelhantes àquelas de laparoscopias urológicas convencionais (como a prostatectomia por laparoscopia), o procedimento está associado a alguns inconvenientes, incluindo acesso intravenoso limitado, tempo cirúrgico relativamente longo, posição de Trendelenburg profunda e pressão intra-abdominal alta. O objetivo principal foi descrever as alterações respiratória e hemodinâmica e as complicações relacionadas à pressão intra-abdominal elevada e à posição de Trendelenburg profunda em pacientes submetidos à prostatectomia robótica. O objetivo secundário foi revelar critérios seguros de alta do centro cirúrgico. Métodos: Foram inscritos prospectivamente 53 pacientes submetidos à prostatectomia robótica entre dezembro de 2009 e janeiro de 2011. As medidas de desfecho primário foram: monitoramento não invasivo, monitoramento invasivo e gasometria feita em decúbito dorsal (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + pneumoperitônio (T2), Trendelenburg pré-desinsuflação (T3), Trendelenburg pós-desinsuflação (T4) e posições supinas (T5). Resultados: O principal desafio clínico em nosso grupo de estudo foi a escolha da estratégia de ventilação para controlar a acidose respiratória, que é detectada por meio da pressão de dióxido de carbono expirado e da gasometria. Além disso, a pressão arterial média permaneceu inalterada e a frequência cardíaca diminuiu significativamente e precisou de intervenção. Os valores da pressão venosa central também estavam acima dos limites normais. Conclusão: A acidose respiratória e sintomas clínicos "semelhantes à obstrução ...

Justificación y objetivos: Aunque muchas características de la prostatectomía robótica sean similares a las de las laparoscopias urológicas convencionales (como la prostatectomía laparoscópica), el procedimiento está asociado con algunos inconvenientes, incluyendo el acceso intravenoso limitado, tiempo quirúrgico relativamente largo, posición de Trendelenburg profunda y presión intraabdominal alta. El objetivo principal fue describir las alteraciones respiratorias y hemodinámicas y las complicaciones relacionadas con la presión intraabdominal elevada y con la posición de Trendelenburg profunda en pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía robótica. El objetivo secundario fue revelar criterios seguros de alta del quirófano. Métodos: Cincuenta y tres pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía robótica entre diciembre de 2009 y enero de 2011 fueron incluidos en un estudio prospectivo. Las principales medidas de resultado fueron: monitorización no invasiva, monitorización invasiva y gasometría realizada en decúbito dorsal (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + neumoperitoneo (T2), Trendelenburg predesinsuflación (T3), Trendelenburg posdesinsuflación (T4) y posiciones supinas (T5). Resultados: Cincuenta y tres pacientes sometidos a prostatectomía robótica fueron incluidos en el estudio. El principal reto clínico en nuestro grupo de estudio fue la elección de la estrategia de ventilación para controlar la acidosis respiratoria, que es detectada por medio de la presión de dióxido de carbono espirado y la gasometría. Además, la presión arterial media permaneció inalterada, y la frecuencia cardíaca disminuyó significativamente y fue necesario intervenir. Los valores de la presión venosa central también estaban por encima de los límites normales. ...

[Robotic prostatectomy: The anesthetist's view for robotic urological surgeries, a prospective study]. / Prostatectomia robótica: análise anestesiológica de cirurgias urológicas robóticas: estudo prospectivo.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Although many features of robotic prostatectomy are similar to those of conventional laparoscopic urological procedures (such as laparoscopic prostatectomy), the procedure is associated with some drawbacks, which include limited intravenous access, relatively long operating time, deep Trendelenburg position, and high intra-abdominal pressure. The primary aim was to describe respiratory and hemodynamic challenges and the complications related to high intra-abdominal pressure and the deep Trendelenburg position in robotic prostatectomy patients. The secondary aim was to reveal safe discharge criteria from the operating room. METHODS: Fifty-three patients who underwent robotic prostatectomy between December 2009 and January 2011 were prospectively enrolled. Main outcome measures were non-invasive monitoring, invasive monitoring and blood gas analysis performed at supine (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + pneumoperitoneum (T2), Trendelenburg-before desufflation (T3), Trendelenburg (after desufflation) (T4), and supine (T5) positions. RESULTS: Fifty-three robotic prostatectomy patients were included in the study. The main clinical challenge in our study group was the choice of ventilation strategy to manage respiratory acidosis, which is detected through end-tidal carbon dioxide pressure and blood gas analysis. Furthermore, the mean arterial pressure remained unchanged, the heart rate decreased significantly and required intervention. The central venous pressure values were also above the normal limits. CONCLUSION: Respiratory acidosis and "upper airway obstruction-like" clinical symptoms were the main challenges associated with robotic prostatectomy procedures during this study.

Anesthetic considerations for robotic cystectomy: a prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Robotic cystectomy is rapidly becoming a part of the standard surgical repertoire for the treatment of prostate cancer. Our aim was to describe respiratory and hemodynamic challenges and the complications observed in robotic cystectomy patients. PATIENTS: Sixteen patients who underwent robotic surgery between December 2009 and January 2011 were prospectively enrolled. Main outcome measures were non-invasive monitoring, invasive monitoring and blood gas analysis performed at supine (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg+pneumoperitoneum (T2), Trendelenburg-before desufflation (T3), Trendelenburg (after desufflation) (T4), and supine (T5) positions. RESULTS: There were significant differences between T0-T1 and T0-T2 with lower heart rates. The mean arterial pressure value at T1 was significantly lower than T0. The central venous pressure value was significantly higher at T1, T2, T3, and T4 than at T0. There was no significant difference in the PET-CO2 value at any time point compared with T0. There were no significant differences in respiratory rate at any time point compared with T0. The mean f values at T3, T4, and T5 were significantly higher than T0. The mean minute ventilation at T4 and T5 were significantly higher than at T0. The mean plateau pressures and peak pressures at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 were significantly higher than the mean value at T0. CONCLUSIONS: Although the majority of patients generally tolerate robotic cystectomy well and appreciate the benefits, anesthesiologists must consider the changes in the cardiopulmonary system that occur when patients are placed in Trendelenburg position, and when pneumoperitoneum is created.

Considerações anestésicas para cistectomia robótica: estudo prospectivo / Anesthetic considerations for robotic cystectomy: a prospective study / Consideraciones anestésicas para la cistectomía robótica:estudio prospectivo

Experiência e objetivos: a cistectomia robótica vem rapidamente se tornando parte do repertório cirúrgico de rotina para o tratamento do câncer de próstata. Nosso objetivo foi descrever os desafios respiratórios e hemodinâmicos e as complicações observadas em pacientes de cistectomia robótica. Pacientes: foram prospectivamente recrutados 16 pacientes tratados com cistectomia robótica entre dezembro de 2009 e janeiro de 2011. As medidas de desfecho primário foram monitoração não invasiva, monitoração invasiva e análise de gases sangüíneos feita nas posições supina (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + pneumoperitônio (T2), Trendelenburg antes da dessuflação (T3), Trendelenburg depois da dessuflacão (T4) e supina (T5). Resultados: houve diferencas significativas entre T0 - T1 e T0 - T2 com frequências cardíacas mais baixas. O valor médio para a pressão arterial em T1 foi significativamente mais baixo do que em T0. O valor da pressão venosa central foi significativamente mais elevado em T1, T2, T3 e T4 versus T0. Não foi observada diferença significativa no valor de PET-CO2 em qualquer ponto temporal, em comparação com T0. Também não foram notadas diferenças significativas na frequência respiratória em qualquer ponto temporal, em comparação com T0. Os valores médios de ƒ em T3, T4 e T5 foram significativamente mais elevados versus T0. A ventilação minuto média em T4 e T5 foi significativamente mais elevada versus T0. As pressões de platô e de pico médias em T1, T2, T3, T4 e T5 foram significativamente mais elevadas versus T0. Conclusões: embora a maioria dos pacientes geralmente tolere satisfatoriamente a cistectomia robótica e perceba os benefícios, os ...

Background and objectives: Robotic cystectomy is rapidly becoming a part of the standard surgical repertoire for the treatment of prostate cancer. Our aim was to describe respiratory and hemodynamic challenges and the complications observed in robotic cystectomy patients. Patients: Sixteen patients who underwent robotic surgery between December 2009 and January 2011 were prospectively enrolled. Main outcome measures were non-invasive monitoring, invasive monitoring and blood gas analysis performed at supine (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + pneumoperitoneum (T2), Trendelenburg-before desufflation (T3), Trendelenburg (after desufflation) (T4), and supine (T5) positions. Results: There were significant differences between T0 - T1 and T0 - T2 with lower heart rates. The mean arterial pressure value at T1 was significantly lower than T0. The central venous pressure value was significantly higher at T1, T2, T3, and T4 than at T0. There was no significant difference in the PET-CO2 value at any time point compared with T0. There were no significant differences in respiratory rate at any time point compared with T0. The mean ƒ values at T3, T4, and T5 were significantly higher than T0. The mean minute ventilation at T4 and T5 were significantly higher than at T0. The mean plateau pressures and peak pressures at T1, T2, T3, T4, and T5 were significantly higher than the mean value at T0. Conclusions: Although the majority of patients generally tolerate robotic cystectomy well and appreciate the benefits, anesthesiologists must consider the changes in the cardiopulmonary system that occur when patients are placed in Trendelenburg position, and when pneumoperitoneum is created. .

Antecedentes y objetivos: la cistectomía robótica se ha convertido rápidamente en parte del repertorio quirúrgico de rutina para el tratamiento del cáncer de próstata. Nuestro objetivo ha sido describir los retos respiratorios y hemodinámicos, junto con las complicaciones observadas en pacientes sometidos a cistectomía robótica. Pacientes: diesiséis pacientes tratados con cistectomía robótica entre diciembre de 2009 y enero de 2011 se reclutaron de forma prospectiva. Las medidas de resultado primario fueron la monitorización no invasiva, la monitorización invasiva y la gasometría sanguínea realizada en las posiciones supina (T0), Trendelenburg (T1), Trendelenburg + neumoperitoneo (T2), Trendelenburg antes del desinflado (T3), Trendelenburg después del desinflado (T4), y supina (T5). Resultados: hubo diferencias significativas entre T0-T1 y T0-T2 con frecuencias cardíacas más bajas. El valor medio para la presión arterial en T1 fue significativamente más bajo que en T0. El valor de la presión venosa central fue significativamente más elevado en T1, T2, T3, y T4 versus T0. No se observó diferencia significativa en el valor de PET-CO2 en ningún momento en comparación con T0. Tampoco se encontraron nunca diferencias significativas en la frecuencia respiratoria en comparación con T0. Los valores medios de ƒ en T3, T4, y T5 fueron significativamente más elevados versus T0. La ventilación minuto promedio en T4 y T5 fue significativamente más elevada versus T0. Las presiones de meseta y de pico promedios en T1, T2, T3, T4, y T5 fueron significativamente más elevadas versus T0. Conclusiones: aunque la mayoría de los pacientes generalmente tolere satisfactoriamente la cistectomía robótica y se dé cuenta de los beneficios, los anestesiólogos deben tener ...